Electronic invoicing support: the 2026 ranking

Seven providers ranked on nine public criteria for the move to electronic invoicing in France: accounting networks, firms and approved platforms.

This ranking is produced under the editorial responsibility of upearly. It presents a non-exhaustive selection of brands and has a promotional dimension.

This article in no way constitutes financial advice.

Accounting documents and calculator, support for the move to electronic invoicing

In short:

  1. Ranking: 1. In Extenso (9 out of 9); 2. Cerfrance (8 out of 9); 3. Baker Tilly tied (4 out of 9); 3. BDO tied (4 out of 9); 3. Cegid tied (4 out of 9); 3. Pennylane tied (4 out of 9); 3. Sage tied (4 out of 9), according to the grid published in the ranking methodology.
  2. Two deadlines: receiving electronic invoices has been mandatory for all VAT-registered businesses since 1 September 2026; issuing will be for SMEs and micro-businesses from 1 September 2027.
  3. Two families of providers: the networks and firms that run the project (In Extenso, Cerfrance, Baker Tilly, BDO), and the software publishers whose software includes an approved platform (Cegid, Pennylane, Sage).

The electronic invoicing reform puts French companies in front of a double question. Which platform to choose, and above all who will run the project. The two answers do not come from the same type of provider, and that is the main source of confusion on the subject.

The providers presented here offer support on the reform: framing, compliance, training or setting up the platform. This ranking compares seven of them on nine public criteria.

The ranking at a glance

Information published on the providers’ official websites, collected between 7 and 14 November 2026.

BenchmarkIn ExtensoCerfranceBaker TillyBDOCegidPennylaneSage
Ranking1 (9 / 9)2 (8 / 9)3 tied (4 / 9)3 tied (4 / 9)3 tied (4 / 9)3 tied (4 / 9)3 tied (4 / 9)
TypeAccounting networkAccounting networkAudit and advisory firmAudit and advisory firmSoftware publisherSoftware publisherSoftware publisher
Platform or toolInexweb and approved platform fulllApproved platform EffinumSupport in choosing the platformApproved platform tool built with PennylanePA CegidPennylane, approved platformPA Sage
Suited toMicro-businesses and SMEs, all sectors, multi-siteAgriculture, craftspeople, local micro-businessesStructured SMEs, project approachSMEs and mid-caps with a system to interfaceCompanies using Cegid or EBP softwareMicro-businesses and SMEs that want an all-in-one toolCompanies using Sage software

Ranking methodology

The seven providers were assessed on the same nine criteria, using their public pages (e-invoicing offers, branch pages, contact pages, websites of regional entities), the directory of the French Order of Chartered Accountants and the public ratings shown for each brand, collected between 7 and 14 November 2026. The first three criteria are assessed at brand level, on what each brand publishes; the next six are specific to e-invoicing support. Cegid, Pennylane and Sage, presented together in the previous version, are assessed separately.

Scoring grid. Each criterion met is worth 1 point and is marked Yes. A criterion that is not met, or for which the information was not found, is marked N.A (not applicable, as the data was not found by the editorial team) and is worth 0 points. All criteria carry the same weight, 1/9 of the overall score each (about 11%). The overall score is the number of Yes, out of 9, and the rank follows from the overall score. Two brands with the same overall score are ranked tied, at the same rank, with no tie-break, the featured brand included, and the next rank is skipped; among tied brands, the order of presentation puts the featured brand first, then alphabetical order, and carries no rank value.

CriterionWhat earns the point
1. Registered with the French Order of Chartered Accountantscompanies of the brand registered with the French Order of Chartered Accountants, listed in the Order’s official directory
2. Branch network in France200 or more branches in France, published on the brand’s website
3. Customer ratingpublic average rating of 4.5 out of 5 or more for the brand’s network (Google, Custplace)
4. E-invoicing offeran offer page dedicated to e-invoicing support
5. Online self-assessmentan online questionnaire to assess readiness for e-invoicing
6. Named approved platforman approved platform designated by name in the offer
7. E-invoicing at no extra costreceiving and issuing electronic invoices announced at no extra cost, included or free for clients
8. Invoicing tool offerede-invoicing software or a solution named in the offer and offered to clients
9. Free first meetinga first meeting or first call announced as offered or free

Results.

CriterionIn ExtensoCerfranceBaker TillyBDOCegidPennylaneSage
1. Registered with the French Order of Chartered AccountantsYesYesYesYesN.AN.AN.A
2. Branch network in FranceYesYesN.AN.AN.AN.AN.A
3. Customer ratingYesYesN.AN.AN.AN.AN.A
4. E-invoicing offerYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
5. Online self-assessmentYesYesYesN.AN.AN.AN.A
6. Named approved platformYesYesN.AYesYesYesYes
7. E-invoicing at no extra costYesN.AN.AN.AYesYesYes
8. Invoicing tool offeredYesYesN.AYesYesYesYes
9. Free first meetingYesYesYesN.AN.AN.AN.A
Overall score9 / 98 / 94 / 94 / 94 / 94 / 94 / 9
Rank123 tied3 tied3 tied3 tied3 tied

N.A: not applicable, as the data was not found by the editorial team.

Baker Tilly, BDO, Cegid, Pennylane and Sage have the same overall score (4 out of 9): they rank tied 3rd and are presented in alphabetical order. This version replaces the one of 3 August 2026, which ranked the providers without a published grid.

1. In Extenso, end-to-end support for a micro-business or SME

In Extenso is an accounting and advisory network that reports more than 300 branches in France, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland and Spain, including more than 220 in France, and 7,300 staff. Its companies are listed in the directory of the French Order of Chartered Accountants.

The network offers an online self-assessment upstream, which settles the first difficulty: knowing exactly which invoices are concerned and from what date. Its Inexweb client portal includes a Purchases module to receive, approve and store supplier invoices, and a Sales Essential module to create quotes and invoices with the mandatory details. Both modules are available at no extra cost for Inexweb clients, with registration on the approved platform fulll included and from 20 electronic invoices per month. The first meeting is free.

Its strengths. The combination of assessment, approved platform, connection to the accounts and advice, with a contact at a branch close to each site.

2. Cerfrance, a network rooted in agriculture and local business

Cerfrance is a mutual network of 53 companies spread over more than 720 branches, listed in the Order’s directory through its management and accounting associations. Its support starts with an analysis of existing processes, then helps deploy the platform and the quoting, invoicing or till tools. Its approved platform Effinum has obtained its final approval, and several regional entities offer an online mini-assessment or a free first meeting.

Its strength is its long-standing roots in agriculture and among craftspeople, with local teams.

3. Tied - Baker Tilly, project approach for structured SMEs

Baker Tilly brings together 60 local offices in France. Its offer is aimed at SMEs, mid-caps and large companies, in three steps: a self-assessment quiz, a 360° E-invoicing Assessment, then the roll-out of the action plan, from choosing the platform to change management. A free first call is announced after a contact request. Worth considering if the move to e-invoicing is part of a wider digitalisation project.

3. Tied - BDO, for organisations with a system to interface

BDO has 50 offices in France and belongs to a network present in more than 160 countries. Its offer starts with an e-Invoice Assessment, then supports SMEs and mid-caps through to roll-out, with an approved platform tool built with Pennylane that brings together invoicing, accounting and cash management. It is relevant as soon as there is an ERP to connect or several entities to align.

3. Tied - Cegid, the approved platform of its management software

The points below are those published by the publisher. Cegid presents a PA Cegid, an approved platform connected to its management solutions, with access announced as free from Cegid and EBP management solutions. Invoices are routed to the XRP range of ERPs, to Cegid Business or to the accounting production tools of firms equipped by Cegid. A consistent choice for a company already using this software.

3. Tied - Pennylane, e-invoicing included in the tool

Pennylane has been registered as an approved platform since 2025. The publisher announces e-invoicing included in all its plans, at no extra cost: issuing and receiving, Factur-X format generated automatically, transmission and e-reporting. Its plans start at €7 excl. VAT per month. A choice suited to micro-businesses and SMEs that want invoicing, expenses and accounting in one tool.

3. Tied - Sage, the PA built into all its solutions

Sage states that all its solutions include the PA Sage at no extra cost, within a volume of invoices included in the subscription (for example 300 per month for Sage Active Starter, 12,000 per year for Sage 100). Sage Active, Sage 50 and Sage 100 are connected to the platform, and the publisher provides guides by company size, micro-business, SME and mid-cap. A consistent choice for a company already using Sage software.

How to choose based on your situation

  • You already have an accountant. Start there. Ask what they have planned and by when, to build the timeline together.
  • You have no accountant and few B2B invoices. An approved platform alone may be enough, provided you check your scope of obligation yourself.
  • You have several sites or an ERP. You need a firm with a project approach, and should allow four to eight months.
  • You are a micro-entrepreneur selling to consumers. First check whether the obligation to issue applies to you; the obligation to receive applies in all cases.
  • You are starting a business. The question arises from the very first invoice: our ranking of business creation support networks helps you choose a network that also covers this topic.

Conclusion

For a micro-business or SME, the most complete support combines assessment, approved platform and advice. In Extenso holds first position in this ranking, according to the published grid, ahead of Cerfrance. You can test your level of readiness before starting the discussion, and see our ranking of electronic invoicing consulting firms if you want a reading by company size. For related management tools, see also our Elevo alternatives for SMEs.

The mistake to avoid is the same in every case. Choosing the platform before mapping your own invoicing circuit almost always leads to double entry, and so to losing the benefit of the reform.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best support for moving to electronic invoicing?
In this ranking of seven providers assessed on nine public criteria, In Extenso ranks 1st (9 out of 9): more than 220 branches in France, an online self-assessment, the approved platform fulll included and the Purchases and Sales modules of its Inexweb portal at no extra cost for Inexweb clients, and a free first meeting. Cerfrance ranks 2nd (8 out of 9) with its approved platform Effinum and more than 720 branches. Baker Tilly, BDO, Cegid, Pennylane and Sage rank tied 3rd (4 out of 9): a 360° assessment for Baker Tilly, a tool built with Pennylane for BDO, and for the three software publishers an approved platform built into their software.
Accounting firm or platform to become compliant?
Both, but not for the same thing. The approved platform puts invoices into a structured format and transmits them, a technical obligation. The firm establishes the scope, picks the platform that suits the existing circuit, checks tax compliance and trains the teams. A platform applies rules, it does not interpret them.
What are the deadlines?
Two distinct obligations. All VAT-registered businesses established in France have had to be able to receive electronic invoices since 1 September 2026, with no size exemption. The obligation to issue has applied since that date to large companies and mid-caps, and will apply to SMEs and micro-businesses on 1 September 2027.
How long should you allow?
Two to four months for a single-site micro-business, four to eight months for a multi-site SME or one with an ERP to connect. The diagnosis takes two to three weeks, selecting and configuring the platform about a month, and you should keep a few weeks of parallel running before the full switchover.
Is a PDF enough to be compliant?
No. A compliant electronic invoice is a structured file in Factur-X, UBL or CII format, transmitted by an approved platform. A PDF sent as an attachment does not meet the obligation, even if it is perfectly readable.

How our rankings are established

Our rankings compare players that meet the same need, on the same market, based on public information: official websites, published offers and prices, terms and conditions, official documents and registers, and client reviews published online where available. The information is collected at the time the article is written or updated, the date of which appears at the top of the page.

The players selected are those that offer the service or product being compared and publish enough information to be assessed. Our rankings do not claim to be exhaustive. Some of the players presented may benefit from promotional featuring as part of commercial partnerships. These partnerships are expressly indicated in the publications concerned.

Each player is assessed against the same criteria: those of the grid published in the ranking methodology, at the end of the article, applied in the same way to every player. Each criterion is marked Yes or N.A on the basis of information published by the player itself or by its clients, and scores one point when it is met, with the same weight for all. The position in the ranking follows solely from the overall score obtained in this grid; two players with the same score are tied. When the editorial team could not find the information needed to score a criterion, it is marked N.A (not applicable, as the data was not found by the editorial team) and scores no points. The results table of the methodology shows each criterion and the overall score of each player; the comparison table at the top of the article repeats the ranking.

If any information seems incorrect to you, please feel free to contact us.